Show simple item record

dc.creatorMata Jiménez, Leonardoes_ES
dc.creatorVargas, William
dc.creatorLoría, Alba Rosa
dc.creatorLevine, Myron M.
dc.creatorLizano, Cecilia
dc.creatorde Céspedes Montealegre, Carlos
dc.creatorNalin, David R.
dc.creatorSimhon Edgar, Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-17T22:03:45Z
dc.date.available2014-09-17T22:03:45Z
dc.date.issued1978-08
dc.identifier.citationhttp://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(78)91686-0/abstractes_ES
dc.identifier.issn0140-6736
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10669/11124
dc.descriptionartículo (arbitrado), Universidad de Costa Rica, Instituto de Investigaciones en Salud (INISA). 1978. Este documento es privado debido a limitaciones de derechos de autor.es_ES
dc.description.abstractIn a randomised double-blind trial, 51 5-10% dehydrated infants were rehydrated with oral electrolyte solutions containing sucrose or glucose. Most infants in both groups were successfuUy rehydrated, but the sucrose solution produced a slower correction of electrolyte abnormalities and a higher percentage of patients who needed more than 24 h of therapy. Where there is adequate knowledge of the oral therapy method sucrose can substitute for glucose in many cases; wbere there is a choice glucose is recommended. THERE is controversy over the relative merits of sucrose and glucose in sugar-electrolyte solutions for oral replacement of diarrhoeal fluid-losses. While both solutions can reduce intravenous fluid needs, 1-4 children! and adults%" receiving the sucrose solution have tended to have more diarrhoea. No controlled trial of sucrose versus glucose has beenreported in infants, who form the majority of patients with acute dehydrating diarrheea, and no trial has compared the two oral solutions without any intravenous fluids in patients with significant dehydration. Because of the importance to government health planners of establishing the relative merits of the two solutions, they were compared in a controlled double-blind clinical trial at the National Children's Hospital, San Jose, Costa Rica.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Narional Children's Hospital and The Institute for Health Research. Univerrsity of Costa Rica, and the Center for Vaccine Development, Division of Infections Diseases. University Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.es_ES
dc.language.isoen_USes_ES
dc.publisherThe Lancet, 312, 277-279es_ES
dc.subjectDietary Sucrosees_ES
dc.subjectGlucosees_ES
dc.subjectElectrolyteses_ES
dc.subjectSucrosees_ES
dc.subjectGlucosaes_ES
dc.subjectAgonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT1es_ES
dc.subjectNiñoes_ES
dc.subjectChildes_ES
dc.subjectSacarosaes_ES
dc.titleComparison of sucrose with glucose in oral therapy of infant diarrheaes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.typeArtículo científicoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0140-6736(78)91686-0
dc.description.procedenceUCR::Vicerrectoría de Investigación::Unidades de Investigación::Ciencias de la Salud::Instituto de Investigaciones en Salud (INISA)es_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record